Thread:Mystic Monkey/@comment-32974037-20170815231553/@comment-679780-20170817093027

I would also like to talk about policy, more accurately, what articles Sega Wiki can have and should be rid of.

For example, I think Sega Wiki should only have articles for the following subjects:
 * Video game, series and media published and/or developed by Sega. (Games, Movies, TV shows, etc)
 * Major characters. (Minor characters like generic NPCs not included)
 * in-game Organisations can share an article, such as the "Badnik" page is acceptable since it is an organisation of robots, but each individual badnik do not warrent an article. Instead each badnik on the list can lead to an SNN article.
 * Sega Hardware, such as consoles, machines and so on.
 * Events and locations that relate to Sega (Such as Sega based conventions, Sega owned arcades or major events in Sega's history.)

Thus articles that are about objects like Chaos Emeralds or Chicken Suit should be deleted because while these items are important to it's respected franchise, they can be covered on Sonic or Billy Hatcher's article. However, links leading to item articles to be readdressed to articles on affiliated Sega wiki. As I said I believe Sega wiki will be better off a sa "Hub-Wikia" where linking to affiliated wiki's is encouraged.

While I know that this will require most of Sega Wiki's existing articles to be deleted, the purpose of these guidelines is to concentrate on the corporation that is Sega. Such as what they make and what they do.. If Sega Wiki waste time on articles on games various details then not only will those articles be sloppy but be pointless given theres already more detailed articles written for such subjects on affiliated sites.

As a Hub-wiki, we shouldn't compete with our affiliates but help and redirect to them. (My inspiration for this idea was from this movie scene) no point making articles we don't need when we can redirect viewers to those wiki's that specialise in them.